The Lollipop War

by Eicher 30. April 2013 04:07

The Lollipop war goes back to 1789! But it did not start in earnest until the great depression.  Here is the most recent installment (mp3 and transcript):

Tags:

Tariffs

Mercantilism in a Large Open Economy

by Eicher 9. September 2010 06:58

Dani Rodrik expounds the virtues and pitfalls of the Chinese exchange rate manipulation. For a change, he does not focus on US-Chinese economics, but on the impact of the undervalued Yuan on poor countries. 

a) use the large open economy diagram to show how a one time reduction in the exchange rate affects China and poor countries

b) explain why the artificially weak Yuan is equivalent to Mercantilism (see page 630) and explain the exact dynamics.

File:Henry Clay - Project Gutenberg eText 16960.png 

Cartoonist E.W. Clay published this 1831 cartoon lampooning the "American System" as the Monkey System with this caption "Every one for himself at the expense of his neighbor!" (Source) Senator Henry Clay of Kentucky is considered the architect of the “American System,” the first US government-sponsored attempt to invigorate the national economy.  The Systemn included:

  • the regimenting of high tariffs to protect fledgling American industries
  • federally supporting 'internal improvements’ in transportation
  • the creation of a strong banking system that would make loans available for businessmen

The system was an attempt to bring Alexander Hamilton’s proposals to fruition, as outlined in his 1792 “Report on Manufacturers.” As proposed under the American System, a protective tariff of 20 to 25 percent on imported goods—such as woolens, cottons, leather, fur, hats, paper, sugar and candy—would protect the nation’s fledgling industries from foreign competition.  Congress passed a tariff in 1816 that increased the price of European goods, which encouraged consumers to buy less expensive American-made goods. (Here is also the Wiki brief on Mercantilism).

Japan as Number 3

by Eicher 19. August 2010 07:21

In 1979, Professor Vogel shocked the world with the bold title of his book: 

It was a shock, because Japan was exporting cars like this at the time: 

 

A few years later, the Japanese car makers brought US car makers to their knees - to the degree that Chrysler received its first government bailout in the early 1980s. When the US car industry was threatened by the popularity of cheaper more fuel efficient Japanese cars, the US government threatened car tariffs in 1981. As Japanese manufacturing productivity exploded across all manufacturing sectors, so did its exports, and soon Ezra Vogel's book became the book to read in the 1980s. 

Alas, Japan never became number 1 - and just a few days ago it lost its number 2 status, as China advanced to become the second largest global economy. The Economist points out, however, that the Chinese rise is less about China than about the Japanese decline: 

WHEN China's economy was announced as the world's second-largest earlier this week, the news was spun as a China story, or occasionally as a story about the Chinese challenge to America. But the data that triggered the announcement were Japanese, and China's rapid catch-up to the Japan says as much about the latter economy as the former. 

Five years ago China’s economy was half as big as Japan’s. This year it will probably be bigger (see chart 1). Quarterly figures announced this week showed that China had overtaken its ancient rival. It had previously done so only in the quarter before Christmas, when Chinese GDP is always seasonally high. Since China’s population is ten times greater than Japan’s, this moment always seemed destined to arrive. But it is surprising how quickly it came. For Japan, which only two decades ago aspired to be number one, the slip to third place is a gloomy milestone. Yet worse may follow. Many of the features of Japanese capitalism that contributed to its long malaise still persist: the country is lucky if its economy grows by 1% a year. Although Japan has made substantial reforms in corporate governance, financial openness and deregulation, they are far from enough. Unless dramatic changes take place, Japan may suffer a third lost decade.

Read the entire piece. It's largely about the structural problems in the Japanese economy, and especially in Japan's corporate sector. But one shouldn't overlook the chilling effect of years of deflation.

Tags:

Tariffs

Sweet Deal

by Eicher 17. March 2010 08:52
Sugar is cheaper in Canada than the US - but Canada has almost no sugar growers. Which trade theory that focus on factor endowments or technology possibly explain that phenomenon? Easy: add tariffs and quotas, especially when enriched with the political economy of protection (Chapter 7).   The Wall Street Journal details that "the gap between what Americans and the rest of the world pay for sugar has reached its widest level in at least a decade, breathing new life into the battle over import quotas that prop up the price of the sweet stuff in the U.S."
 
The history of sugar quotas since 1816 (to subsidize plantations in the newly acquired Louisiana territory) is detailed in "The Great Sugar Shaft." Curiously, its
another cautionary tale of trade policy hysteresis.  
 
[SUGAR_p1]
Source: WSJ
 
Here are some questions from the WSJ-in-Education program

1. Suppose the world market for sugar is perfectly competitive, and
that the U.S. is insignificant in the world market for sugar. Also suppose that the
U.S. sugar market is perfectly competitive. What is the effect of the introduction
of a U.S. sugar quota on the price of sugar in the U.S. market?

2. What is the effect of a sugar quota on U.S. consumer surplus? Why do
U.S. sugar consumers oppose U.S. sugar quotas?

3. What is the effect of a quota on U.S. producer surplus? Why do U.S.
sugar producers lobby for U.S. sugar quotas?

4. Suppose sugar consumption is a cause of the current U.S. obesity
epidemic, and that obesity is a leading cause of type 2 diabetes. Does sugar U.S.
consumption have a negative externality? If so, is it possible that a U.S. sugar
quota improves economic welfare? Related article: Premier Wen Jiabao had sharp words
for Washington, ceding little ground on China's currency policy and suggesting that
U.S. efforts to boost its exports by weakening the dollar amounted to "a kind of
trade protectionism."
 

The 105.4 % U.S. Chicken Tariff

by Eicher 8. February 2010 14:01

Chicken-Tariffs Turn into a Saga. First Russia attacked Bush Legs, now China is taking on Tyson (and that's not Mike Tyson). 

Mike Shedlock has the skinny and a nice summary.

Tags:

Tariffs

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.4.5.0
Theme by Extensive SEO